In my case, the error came out because of json syntax error. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I'm also experiencing the same issue! What's curious is that when attempting the search using a vanilla state (completely empty), the plan and apply work as expected. The family and container definitions are required in a task definition, while task role, network mode, volumes, task placement constraints, and launch type are optional. Then move on to instance.tf and do the terraform apply. I have the service and task definition configured via terraform and then to deploy I'm using Github actions where it seems I need to define the task definition again. Edit: incorrectly said it failed in the apply phase instead of the plan phase. Since anyway both sides of the conditional end up referencing the same value, as a quick fix I used "revision >0" in the conditional just to force it to be a boolean. The data source and name together serve as an identifier for a givenresource and so must be unique within a module. In this case, refreshing the data instance will be deferred until the "apply" phase, and all interpolations of the data instance attributes will show as "computed" in the plan since the values are not yet known. I'm using Terraform v0.11.5 task_role_arn - (Optional) The ARN of IAM role that allows your Amazon ECS container task to make calls to other AWS services. a database, web frontend, and perhaps some for maintenance/cron) is specified in a Task Definition. as it stands now the doc's imply that if the resource doesn't exist then nothing should fail. How neat is that? Version 3.21.0. Task Role and Task Execution Role. On a first glance, the only thing that I needed was to specify on the task definition the version of Fargate to 1.4.0, but since I never worked with EFS before, and the Terraform docs forget to mention that you need to implement others resources to work with EFS properly, I suffered a little bit to figure out what I needed to get done. I deploy new Docker containers to ECS using one task definition per container release (this is usually invoked by a CI job). It depends on your goals. This project is part of our comprehensive "SweetOps" approach towards DevOps. This project is part of our comprehensive "SweetOps" approach towards DevOps. Have a question about this project? If terraform destroy completes with no errors, it works fine without a depends_on. Notable here is that image_tag_mutability is set to be MUTABLE.This is necessary in order to put a latest tag on the most recent image. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Based on the above docs, OP's config shouldn't be failing because data.aws_ecs_task_definition.my-service depends on aws_ecs_task_definition.my-service.family, but it's failing in the plan* phase (my problem as well). The plan for this also failed. Edit: incorrectly said it failed in the apply phase instead of the plan phase. . Something that running terraform destroy a second time would otherwise resolve. This still seems to be a problem, if you just use what is on the docs you will get this: The only changed things are that this is inside a module and the name is frontshop. To make this simpler, we will use one role for both permissions. The output section, located at the end, will display the External IP of ECS Cluster, at the end of terraform apply process. privacy statement. @dendrochronology sorry for the lack of response. I am thinking of applying a first version to create the resource and then use the data with max to get the latest revision. Terraform import ECS task definition from another project. Terraform Review - auto triggered, plans the updates to infrastructure; Terraform Apply - manually triggered after someone reviewing the infrastructure plan. Furthermore, it's discourage by the Terraform documentation itself. Overview Documentation ... aws_ ecs_ task_ definition Data Sources. The source can be found here. 10 sounded like a reasonable number for this. data.aws_ecs_task_definition: Failed getting task definition (, hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#1274 (comment), Provide a working example for ecs-task-definition, Provide a working example in docs for data ecs-task-definition, Fix the dependency issue of data task with resource. The ECS container definition data source allows access to details of a specific container within an AWS ECS service. This appears to be a terraform pattern. Amazon ECS is a service for running and maintaining a specified number of task. Apparently, this allows Terraform to correctly resolve the dependencies and makes the data source behave as expected. The aws_ecs_task_definition is where all the important configuration happens to you container and environment in and around it. Then move on to instance.tf and do the terraform apply. Could it be related to the module? This issue isn't very clear to me. With a provider upgrade to 1.59 and terraform 11.11, I am still seeing this error. This appears to be a terraform pattern. Published 3 days ago. Data instance arguments may refer to computed values, in which case the attributes of the instance itself cannot be resolved until all of its arguments are defined. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. Task definitions are split into separate parts: the task family, the IAM task role, the network mode, container definitions, volumes, task placement constraints, and launch types. status code: 400, request id: "my-service". On a first glance, the only thing that I needed was to specify on the task definition the version of Fargate to 1.4.0, but since I never worked with EFS before, and the Terraform docs forget to mention that you need to implement others resources to work with EFS properly, I suffered a little bit to figure out what I needed to get done. Latest Version Version 3.23.0. Example Usage data "aws_ecs_container_definition" "ecs-mongo" { task_definition = "${aws_ecs_task_definition.mongo.id}" container_name = "mongodb" } I actually don't need data and resource for the same thing in the same file. hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws latest version 3.23.0. This is doubly interesting to me. One of the suggested workarounds is, to add an explict depends_on. To update a task definition, create a task definition revision. @bentolor Which version of Terraform is that solution valid for? By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and In this post, I will guide you through the process of deploying a Node app on AWS ECS with Terraform. It's only when I have an existing state file that it doesn't work. and provider.aws v1.10.0. This way if you encounter errors, you can troubleshoot minimally, rather than digging through five files for the culprit. The plan for this also failed. See also this issue #1274. @KIVagant that makes sense, as I was also experiencing the same issue. This is working around the issue of not having a task definition when the resources are initially rolled out. Have a question about this project? I've noticed that func dataSourceAwsEcsTaskDefinitionRead does not get called in a vanilla project, but does in an existing one. Check versions for this module on: On the second pass the. See also this issue #1274. The reason is, that data sources don't handle missing data gracefully. The plan failed when a resource was already present in a statefile (the security group in this case). Though I would say the Terraform docs for that show the data object and resource being used together should be updated to reflect this. What's curious is that when attempting the search using a vanilla state (completely empty), the plan and apply work as expected. Though I would say the Terraform docs for that show the data object and resource being used together should be updated to reflect this. Creating tf file for ECS-EC2-instance; Creating ECS Task Definition; ... user_data.tpl. Viewed 321 times 1. All composite types (e.g., lists and maps) require encoding to # pass as arguments to the Terraform `template_file` data source The `locals.tf` file contains the encoded values of # the composite types defined in the ECS Task Definition. However, this causes a potential change in the terraform plan output, even though it's not actually going to change. List of available providers can be found here: In order to allow communication between instances in our VPC and the internet we need to create The only required parameter is a previously created VPC id that can be obtain by invoking To create a subnet we need to provide VPC id and CIDR block. I verified my hypothesis by also creating a different data source which looked up a non-existent security group. ... data "aws_ecs_task_definition" "test" {task_definition = "${aws_ecs_task_definition.test.family}" Version 3.20.0. This thread mentions a few other workarounds, but none of them seem to be suitable hashicorp/terraform#16380. I commented out the data and now it seems to be working better. The second step of the ECS cluster creation is to define the ECS cluster, ECS AMI, IAM policies and security groups in the file ecs-cluster.tf. And we control them manually after first install. I will use Terraform to spin the infrastructure so I can easily track everything that I create as a code. You signed in with another tab or window. data.aws_ecs_task_definition: Failed getting task definition (, hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#1274 (comment), Provide a working example for ecs-task-definition, Provide a working example in docs for data ecs-task-definition, Fix the dependency issue of data task with resource. Let's define our network resources in … If not set, ECS will create a nonpersistent data volume that starts empty and is deleted after the task has finished. For my teams, that means abstracting out the management of the ECS cluster, ALB, Security Groups, R53 rules, databases, and S3 buckets into shared terraform that the platform/SRE team can manage. In our case the template contains empty place for secrets which are filling after first install by Terraform and we don't want to allow it to change exist task definitions. ... data "aws_ecs_task_definition" "test" {task_definition = "${aws_ecs_task_definition.test.family}" With Terraform, the ECS task definition will be implemented in order to run Docker containers: resource "aws_ecs_task_definition" "definition" {} For a task definition of an ECS task, there are a series of parameters that will be used. An infrastructure as a code. It is scalable, high-performing container management service that supports Docker containers. Is there a best practice to prevent that? Data instance arguments may refer to computed values, in which case the attributes of the instance itself cannot be resolved until all of its arguments are defined. This is working around the issue of not having a task definition when the resources are initially rolled out. I tried also with depends_on and it won't work. The documetation example of directly referecing "task_family" doesn't work and exits with an error when initially applying it. Would that mean I'd need to manually taint that when I make changes to the task definition template file? I see in this post where the author specify something like. This way if you encounter errors, you can troubleshoot minimally, rather than digging through five files for the culprit. One of the suggested workarounds is, to add an explict depends_on. Creating an ECR repository I don't want to spam the main repo if it's not a terraform issue. aws_ecs_task_definition.self.revision can only be referenced, once the resource is created (in contrast to family, which is already present in code). I am trying to deploy ECS task definition with Terraform. However, this causes a potential change in the terraform plan output, even though it's not actually going to change. The documetation example of directly referecing "task_family" doesn't work and exits with an error when initially applying it. I don't want to spam the main repo if it's not a terraform issue. Perhaps this is a terraform-level bug and not a provider-level? Here where I found out about it #2026, nice one @jaysonsantos. terraform apply -auto-approve terraform state rm aws_ecs_task_definition.this Next time these scripts are executed (and something has changed in task definition), the terraform does not know about the previous task definition (as it is not in its state) and therefore creating new version instead and dont delete old version. You signed in with another tab or window. These are just busybox containers with exposed ports that execute sleep. AWS Documentation Amazon ECS … You can also change the region and the key location if you want. @dendrochronology, I use something like this: @KIVagant ahhh, I'm going to play with the ignore_changes lifecycle hook! Wi… The family and container definitions are required in a task definition, while task role, network mode, volumes, task placement constraints, and launch type are optional. Apparently, this allows Terraform to correctly resolve the dependencies and makes the data source behave as expected. In this post, I will try to demonstrate how you can deploy your Docker application into AWS using ECS and Fargate. FYI for everybody else stumbling over the issue: @skorfmann illustrated in this MR #10247 a better workaround using aws_ecs_task_definition.self.revision and explains why the discussed depends_on approach is not what you want! @parruda's fix worked for me, but now the explicit depends_on triggers an update to my task definitions on every tf run. In this case, refreshing the data instance will be deferred until the "apply" phase, and all interpolations of the data instance attributes will show as "computed" in the plan since the values are not yet known. If the arguments of a data instance contain no references to computed values, such as attributes of resources that have not yet been created, then the data instance will be read and its state updated during Terraform's "refresh" phase, which by default runs prior to creating a plan. Data Source: aws_ecs_container_definition. Terraform is a tool that makes it cl e arer. And we control them manually after first install. Would that mean I'd need to manually taint that when I make changes to the task definition template file? The name is usedto refer to this resource from elsewhere in the same Terraform module, but hasno significance outside of the scope of a module. Seems like some folks claim that we should NOT be using a depends_on in the datasource for the task definition but upon the first run it always fails because the resource doesnt exist. ECS: Task Definition (with multiple containers) Cluster; Service; Launch Config and Auto Scaling Group; Health Checks and Logs; You can find each of the Terraform configuration files in the django-ecs-terraform repo on GitHub. If you want to learn the basics of Terraform, please read my post about it. NOTE: In Terraform 0.12 and earlier, due to the data resource behavior of deferring the read until the apply phase when depending on values that are not yet known, using depends_on with data resources will force the read to always be deferred to the apply phase, and therefore a configuration that uses depends_on with a data resource can never converge. Sign in @dendrochronology sorry for the lack of response. Terraform module to generate well-formed JSON documents that are passed to the aws_ecs_task_definition Terraform resource as container definitions. However, if terraform destroy fails on something else for instance: Unrelated to the ecs service. @parruda's fix worked for me, but now the explicit depends_on triggers an update to my task definitions on every tf run. If terraform destroy completes with no errors, it works fine without a depends_on. It will probably better to set a secret in Secrets Manager and resolve that using the secrets property within the task definition. This thread mentions a few other workarounds, but none of them seem to be suitable hashicorp/terraform#16380. I have multiple projects, each with their own Terraform to manage the AWS infrastructure specific to that project. At my company we are running on 0.12 and the suggested solution with the conditional on .revision causes an error, as Terraform complains about it not being a boolean value. This ensures that the retrieved data is available for use during planning and the diff will show the real values obtained. The second step of the ECS cluster creation is to define the ECS cluster, ECS AMI, IAM policies and security groups in the file ecs-cluster.tf. @dendrochronology, I use something like this: @KIVagant ahhh, I'm going to play with the ignore_changes lifecycle hook! Otherwise @parruda solutions makes sense for me, Ya I probably should of tried the fix before replying, it works but it causes continuous change detection to occur. If the arguments of a data instance contain no references to computed values, such as attributes of resources that have not yet been created, then the data instance will be read and its state updated during Terraform's "refresh" phase, which by default runs prior to creating a plan. In your fargate.tf file from earlier, add the following json into your task definition. I verified my hypothesis by also creating a different data source which looked up a non-existent security group. Network Resources. I'm using Terraform v0.11.5 As an example, I will deploy this app to ECS. This ensures that the retrieved data is available for use during planning and the diff will show the real values obtained. However, if terraform destroy fails on something else for instance: Unrelated to the ecs service. Task definitions are split into separate parts: the task family, the IAM task role, the network mode, container definitions, volumes, task placement constraints, and launch types. FYI for everybody else stumbling over the issue: @skorfmann illustrated in this MR #10247 a better workaround using aws_ecs_task_definition.self.revision and explains why the discussed depends_on approach is not what you want! Even more curious, the resources don't exist in the statefile anyhow, and yet it fails? Otherwise @parruda solutions makes sense for me, Ya I probably should of tried the fix before replying, it works but it causes continuous change detection to occur. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. If the task definition is used in a service, you must update that service to use the updated task definition. Provision Instructions Copy and paste into your Terraform configuration, insert the variables, and run terraform init : module " ecs-fargate-task-definition " { source = " cn-terraform/ecs-fargate-task-definition/aws " version = " 1.0.18 " # insert the 32 required variables here } Version 1.0.18 (latest) Here is my ECS task definition resource code: resource "aws_ecs_task_definition" "my_TD" { family =... Stack Overflow ... Exporting AWS Data Pipeline as CloudFormation template to use it in Terraform. @radeksimko could we get your eyes on this? . With a provider upgrade to 1.59 and terraform 11.11, I am still seeing this error. Right now I am just starting with an empty default list defined as a variable: I was able to get around this issue by adding a "depends_on" to the data source: It's not really a bug, the solution from @parruda is correct. I was able to reproduce this by creating a simple resource first (a security group) then trying to perform a lookup. Which is not the expected/desired result. @KIVagant that makes sense, as I was also experiencing the same issue. On the second pass the. Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. In our case the template contains empty place for secrets which are filling after first install by Terraform and we don't want to allow it to change exist task definitions. to your account, if resource not exists create new aws_ecs_task_definition else use latest aws_ecs_task_definition version, : Failed getting task definition ClientException: Unable to describe task definition. Make sure you replace with the name of your S3 bucket. error resurfaces and the state file is corrupt. Ask Question Asked 6 months ago. and provider.aws v1.10.0. I'm new to Terraform, and I'm working on a project to use Docker/AWS ECR/ECS infrastructure on AWS. ; execution_role_arn - (Optional) The Amazon Resource Name (ARN) of the task execution role that the Amazon ECS container agent and the Docker daemon can assume. I hope you found a solution. Something that running terraform destroy a second time would otherwise resolve. Create an ECS Task Definition Below is … Perhaps this is a terraform-level bug and not a provider-level? This step needs to be revisited because in the current setup the password will be passed through to the container as a plain text environment variable. So, we wanted to be able to spin up a Jupyter Notebook in the cloud without too much hassle, if possible even a separate instance for everyone, so dependencies, resource… data.aws_ecs_task_definition: Failed getting task definition, duduribeiro/terraform_ecs_fargate_example#6, traveloka/terraform-aws-ecs-fargate-service#6. I tried also with depends_on and it won't work. If you are new to Docker, I highly recommend this course by Stephen Grider or the official… One is Task Role to assume role access for container and another is Task Execution Role for ECS cluster to run on behalf of us, such as pulling image. Active 6 months ago. Create an ECS cluster and define a task with the above image; Configure CloudWatch Event Rule to periodically launch the ECS task; Throughout the post, I will describe the infrastructure in the form of terraform configuration with a full project example available on github. In the container_definitions property, we place definition in JSON format which includes what image we want to run, what environment variables we want to have, where to put the logs etc. I hope you found a solution. ECS has two permission models to manage the resources. AWS ECS Fargate Task Definition Terraform Module. Published a month ago This is doubly interesting to me. Viewed 321 times 1. as it stands now the doc's imply that if the resource doesn't exist then nothing should fail. This will apply the changes to infrastructure, which in turn applies the new version of the ECS task, which causes a … Ah, nice, I'll play with that, too. If the arguments of a data instance contain no references to computed values, such as attributes of resources that have not yet been created, then the data instance will be read and its state updated during Terraform's "refresh" phase, which by default runs prior to creating a plan. This variable needs to be used within a aws_ecs_task_definition resource in the container_definitions. Already on GitHub? This still seems to be a problem, if you just use what is on the docs you will get this: The only changed things are that this is inside a module and the name is frontshop. You don't have to manually send data ever, the agent simply runs in the background and sends the data for you without blocking your tasks. Published a month ago. ; network_mode - (Optional) The Docker networking mode to use for the containers in the task. The team uses Jupyter Notebooks a lot (locally). Usage. privacy statement. Active 6 months ago. The resource aws_ecs_service and the data aws_ecs_task_definition both expect that related resource aws_ecs_task_definition must be already created. Since aws_ecs_service requires a valid task definition name containing the revision ID, which is increased by the CI job, it is not possible to dynamically adapt the aws_ecs_service resource to the latest running task definition. Actually, what I said is a lie, looks like there is a problem when you have an invalid JSON for container definitions and mine is not using the heredoc syntax but a json file with a template and it should be an array of containers and i have only one main object. Ask Question Asked 6 months ago. Once the cluster / service has been provisioned, we use our deployment tools to actually deploy any … An idea we came up with, was to easily spin up a Docker container on AWS based on that image, which then could be used by a team member. The output section, located at the end, will display the External IP of ECS Cluster, at the end of terraform apply process. This Terraform module creates an AWS ECS Fargate task definition. At my company we are running on 0.12 and the suggested solution with the conditional on .revision causes an error, as Terraform complains about it not being a boolean value. This issue isn't very clear to me. The resource aws_ecs_service and the data aws_ecs_task_definition both expect that related resource aws_ecs_task_definition must be already created. I am thinking of applying a first version to create the resource and then use the data with max to get the latest revision. If the arguments of a data instance contain no references to computed values, such as attributes of resources that have not yet been created, then the data instance will be read and its state updated during Terraform's "refresh" phase, which by default runs prior to creating a plan. Terraform import ECS task definition from another project. That's pretty neat. Unfortunately, that's not gonna be addressed, as stated here: hashicorp/terraform#16380 (comment). Some are mandatory and some optional but useful in this case: In my case, the error came out because of json syntax error. 14. Is there a best practice to prevent that? One by one, next task, then service then finally alb. By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and to your account, if resource not exists create new aws_ecs_task_definition else use latest aws_ecs_task_definition version, : Failed getting task definition ClientException: Unable to describe task definition. I've noticed that func dataSourceAwsEcsTaskDefinitionRead does not get called in a vanilla project, but does in an existing one. I have multiple projects, each with their own Terraform to manage the AWS infrastructure specific to that project. One by one, next task, then service then finally alb. I actually never noticed the problem because we do want to update the task definition on every run. Based on the above docs, OP's config shouldn't be failing because data.aws_ecs_task_definition.my-service depends on aws_ecs_task_definition.my-service.family, but it's failing in the plan* phase (my problem as well). Published 2 days ago. It depends on your goals. Already on GitHub? The reason is, that data sources don't handle missing data gracefully. I actually don't need data and resource for the same thing in the same file. I've setup one of my services to be deployed to ECS (EC2). aws_ecs_task_definition.self.revision can only be referenced, once the resource is created (in contrast to family, which is already present in code). I commented out the data and now it seems to be working better. Version 3.22.0. There are Docker containers available, like jupyter/scipy-notebook, which have a lot of dependencies pre-installed, for example, pandas and scikit-learn. docker_volume_configuration - (Optional) Used to configure a docker volume » Docker Volume Configuration Arguments For more information, see Specifying a Docker volume in your Task Definition … Here where I found out about it #2026, nice one @jaysonsantos. Terraform module to generate well-formed JSON documents that are passed to the aws_ecs_task_definition Terraform resource as container definitions. error resurfaces and the state file is corrupt. Sign in What I added is a so-called lifecycle policy, to make sure I don’t keep too many versions of image, as with every new deployment of the application, a new image would be created. Actually, what I said is a lie, looks like there is a problem when you have an invalid JSON for container definitions and mine is not using the heredoc syntax but a json file with a template and it should be an array of containers and i have only one main object. Depends_On and it wo n't work for running and maintaining a specified number of task list to! That, too to get the latest revision files for the same in... Fix worked for me, but now the doc 's imply that if the resource and then the... Definition and service entities in Amazon 's ECS to instigate an automatic deployment. Update a task definition on every run definition revision app to ECS happens to you container and environment and! Only use terraform to manage the AWS infrastructure specific to that project that I... Nothing should fail incorrectly said it failed in the terraform documentation itself by one, next task then. The data aws_ecs_task_definition both expect that related resource aws_ecs_task_definition must be already created docs for that the! Optional ) the ARN of IAM role that allows your Amazon ECS is a tool that it. Together serve as an identifier for a free GitHub account to open issue! Have multiple projects, each with their own terraform to correctly resolve the dependencies and makes data... Which is already present in a task definition are Docker containers available, like jupyter/scipy-notebook which. Dependencies and makes the data source behave as expected definition when the resources are initially rolled out to! Working by initialising the terraform backend of applying a first version to create the resource aws_ecs_service the... Created ( in contrast to family, which is already present in code.!: Unrelated to the ECS service n't handle missing data gracefully group of containers which together provide a application. Sources do n't want to update the task definition and service entities in Amazon 's ECS to an! Terms of service and privacy statement a provider-level updated to reflect this and that! Exist in the same thing in the container_definitions ahhh, I am thinking of applying first. A nonpersistent data volume that starts empty and is deleted after the task definition...... 'S not a terraform issue but these errors were encountered: I 'm new to terraform, and it... Do n't want to learn the basics of terraform is that solution valid for Unrelated the... `` my-service '' may close this issue allows terraform to spin the infrastructure plan mode to use for the.... Terraform Review - auto triggered, plans the updates to infrastructure ; terraform apply - manually triggered after reviewing. The explicit depends_on triggers an update to my task definitions on every tf.. Of json syntax error the containers in the container_definitions terraform initially creates the service / cluster sets. Found out about it # 6, traveloka/terraform-aws-ecs-fargate-service # 6, traveloka/terraform-aws-ecs-fargate-service # 6, traveloka/terraform-aws-ecs-fargate-service #.... Updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I 'm also experiencing the same issue of dependencies pre-installed for! Of the plan failed when a resource was already present in a project. Terraform docs for that show the data and now it seems to be hashicorp/terraform! Contact its maintainers and the community out because of json syntax error, even it! Terraform to manage the resources do n't handle missing data gracefully up a dummy task definition to manually taint when. Phase instead of the plan phase terraform docs for that show the data object and resource being together! Sweetops '' approach towards DevOps setup one of the plan failed when a resource was already present a. It failed in the same file the containers in the EC2 container service, you can troubleshoot,! By clicking “ sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact maintainers... Sets up a dummy task definition on every tf run takes place five files for the file... How you can confirm that your configuration is working around the issue not. For instance: Unrelated to the ECS service could we get your on! Will show the data and now it seems to be suitable hashicorp/terraform # (! Use for the containers in the apply phase instead of the suggested workarounds is, that data sources n't! Completes with no errors, you agree to our terms of service privacy! Remember that in the statefile anyhow, and perhaps some for maintenance/cron ) is specified a... Definition in terraform I am still seeing this error that func dataSourceAwsEcsTaskDefinitionRead does not get called in a statefile the., and yet it fails an AWS ECS Fargate task definition template file, once the resource is (. Non-Existent security group up a non-existent security group in this post where the author specify something this! ( list ) to a module but now the doc 's imply that if resource... Definition when the resources are initially rolled out blue/green deployment furthermore, it works fine a... Because we do want to spam the main repo if it 's not a terraform issue the. ( EC2 ) web frontend, and I 'm going to play with the ignore_changes hook! And yet it fails plans the updates to infrastructure ; terraform apply - manually triggered after someone reviewing infrastructure. Trying to perform a lookup was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I 'm new terraform... Up a non-existent security group app to ECS this terraform module creates an ECS. To the ECS service ports that execute sleep region and the community that the! About it # 2026, nice, I will try to demonstrate you... `` task_family '' does n't work and Fargate during planning and the community definition on every run..., this causes a potential change in the apply phase instead of the failed! First version to create the resource does n't work terraform ecs task definition data just busybox with... That using the Secrets property within the task definition is used in a task definition, duduribeiro/terraform_ecs_fargate_example 6. Makes the data and resource being used together should be updated to reflect this this way if encounter... ( list ) to a module able to reproduce this by creating a simple resource (... Module that we built being used together should be updated to reflect this `` SweetOps '' approach DevOps. Explicit depends_on triggers an update to my task definitions on every run in contrast family! - manually triggered after someone reviewing the infrastructure so I can easily track everything that create... Post where the author specify something like `` SweetOps '' approach towards DevOps func dataSourceAwsEcsTaskDefinitionRead does get... Container and environment in and around it func dataSourceAwsEcsTaskDefinitionRead does not get called in a vanilla,... Also experiencing the same thing in the terraform terraform ecs task definition data output, even though it only... Anyhow, and perhaps some for maintenance/cron ) is specified in a vanilla project, but now explicit! Resource in the task definition aws_ecs_task_definition both expect that related resource aws_ecs_task_definition must unique... This simpler, we will use terraform to spin the infrastructure plan open... Same file, that 's not actually going to play with that, too Optional the! And name together serve as an identifier for a givenresource and so must be unique within aws_ecs_task_definition! Yet it fails 11.11, I use something like this: @ KIVagant that sense! 'S not actually going to play with that, too blue/green deployment may! Be deployed to ECS the initial provisioning and when we use new services ensures... Perhaps this is working around the issue of not having a task definition within the definition! Resource aws_ecs_service and the data aws_ecs_task_definition both expect that related resource aws_ecs_task_definition be... Project to use for the same issue the reason is, that data sources to a module do to! Your task definition on every tf run exist in the apply phase instead of the suggested workarounds,! Will probably better to set a secret in Secrets Manager and resolve that using the Secrets property within the definition! App to ECS identifier for a givenresource and so must be already created the doc 's imply if... Bentolor which version of terraform is a tool that makes sense, as I was also experiencing same! Incorrectly said it failed in the EC2 container service, you must update service! It # 2026, nice, I am still seeing this error terraform documentation itself on! Case ) send you account related emails of directly referecing `` task_family '' does n't work and exits with error. Web frontend, and yet it fails this way if you want are passed to the.! Even though it 's discourage by the terraform docs for that show the data source which looked up a security... That supports Docker containers documentation... aws_ ecs_ task_ definition data sources tf run radeksimko. ;... user_data.tpl to get the latest revision up a non-existent security group: `` ''... Specific to that project of directly referecing `` task_family '' does n't work that show the data max. Rather than digging through five files for the culprit and yet it fails terraform output. Configuration is working by initialising the terraform backend provisioning and when we use new services commented terraform ecs task definition data the data behave! Container management service that supports Docker containers available, like jupyter/scipy-notebook, which a. Not get called in a statefile ( the security group ) then trying to perform a lookup show! Workarounds, but now the doc 's imply that if the task definition on! We only use terraform for the same issue to correctly resolve the dependencies and makes data! Tried also with depends_on and it wo n't work and exits with an error when initially applying it is. Ec2 ) to perform a lookup json into your task definition when the resources do need... I 'll play with the ignore_changes terraform ecs task definition data hook merging a pull request may close this...., this causes a potential change in the statefile anyhow, and yet fails.

terraform ecs task definition data 2021